 | | Re: The NXT step for HiTechnic?
|
|
(...) Nice idea, but two questions: How many GBC modules used an RCX? And how many of those RCXs had a free sensor port? Of course for next year's NXT-based GBC, with proper programming, a single BlueTooth cell-phone could turn off the 10% of the (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) You could have XTJ for java and XTF for forth (although fortran also starts with f but somehow I doubt anyone is going to write a fortran compiler for the NXT :P ) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The NXT step for HiTechnic?
|
|
(...) I have seen the compass module work on the RCX. Very cool!! Having the conversion wires announced (which I hadn't noticed before) relieves me. When I was out at the HT website looking at the NXT compass announcement, I went ahead and bought (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
Hi, I think as a name XT sounds cool. That gives XTOS for an operating systems and my favourite XTC for a C like programming language (you have to say it out loud a few times). Seems to work OK with Java and Fourth. Thomas (19 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) Hi, First I am not a lawyer. However I believe Steve Jobs of Apple computers still own the name and trademark of 'NeXT'. They (Apple) are even have gone after websites with domain names using 'ipod' and 'NeXT'. Just give you an idea for (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Using NXT in a name - legal?
|
|
(...) Heh, just reread Steve's reply and I think the answer is already hidden in there. Didn't spot it the first time. (19 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | The NXT step for HiTechnic?
|
|
Browsing around the HiTechnic site I noticed this update: (URL) So the NXT digital interface is already showing some of its strengths it seems. I was always surprised that John could even get 3 degrees of accuracy out of that sensor, but with 1 (...) (19 years ago, 4-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) I'd say: Go for the NXT thing! Give us a language that utilizes the NXT as much as possible. As the NXT is both faster and has more memory than RCX (not to mention the CyberMaster, which is all I have for the moment) it doesn't seem (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RC DrWho K9
|
|
You might want to check out: (URL) (20 years ago, 2-Feb-06, to lugnet.space, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Tester
|
|
My last 2 posts here have fallen by the wayside somewhere. This is a test message to see if it gets through. Sorry if you thought it was about some sort of new program debugger software or maybe a design for a robotic teacher. Thomas (20 years ago, 2-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
