 | | Re: RC DrWho K9
|
|
Very nice!!! Russell _so_ has to work this into Series 3 somewhere. ;) (20 years ago, 2-Feb-06, to lugnet.space, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RC DrWho K9
|
|
Hi I've been building some DrWho lego .......I'm still working on all my DrWho MOCs Dalek, Davros, Cyberman and K9 but some friendly AFOLs have said I should RC my Dalek or K9 so I picked up a cheap "Dirt Crusher RC" set as the base of my go at an (...) (20 years ago, 2-Feb-06, to lugnet.space, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Performance should come first. But thinking about API compatability, hopefully we will get a more programmable environment than the RCX's limitation from registers, functions and memory. A slowdown process may also be needed to make the NXT (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | So when do we know about the MDP?
|
|
It ends Sunday, will participants receive emails on Monday? I would assume so since they want to deliver the kits by the end of February. -aps (20 years ago, 1-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: studless construction practice
|
|
(...) Wait until you try to take the dang things apart ;-). For studless disassembly, I find a thin sheet of textured rubber invaluable for gripping the pins to pull them out (commonly used for opening stubborn jar lids). This does point out one (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: studless construction practice
|
|
I've recently got back into technics.. and got a few of the 2004/05 kits... my first impression was: "This is Peg-o... not Lego!" after my first 4 hour session of building the 8436 truck.. my fingers were really sore from inserting so many little (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Absolutely. I think the design of the NXT NQC should be dependent on the standard firmware just as NQC was based on the RCX firmware. David nailed exactly what I'm interested in. Even when using NQC it still **feels** like I'm writing in C. It (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Definitely performance! Trying to porting an old RCX program to the NXT would be near impossible -- everything is so different there. Just as you'd have to totally rebuild your robot, you have to do a total rewrite of your code anyway. So (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
|
|
(...) Following Bert van Dam: (URL) would investigate a self-learning robot with NXT via a wireless connection to my computer as a father-son project. (20 years ago, 1-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
|
(...) Oh, performance! NXT NQC should match the NXT brick's capabilities. How many people have such sophisticated programs that they need to port from the RCX to the NXT to realisically demand compatibility? I mean this a robot hobby tool. Half the (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
