 | | Re: Does RIS2.0 set use the fiber optics cable?
|
|
(...) The USB tower can be connected to the Scout and MicroScout bricks with the FO light tube contained in the RIS2.0 set. Have a look at WinVLL: (URL) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.vll)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Tower and Hyperthreading
|
|
(...) Unfortunately there's no consistency here. All of our problem machines are < 3Ghz, but usually > 2Ghz. Rob Limbaugh was right when he said LEGO Tech Support isn't the greatest. As a Host in the Forum I'm supposed to direct problems like this (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: NQC for sale?
|
|
BTW, Interactive C (originally developed for the Handyboard) is available as freeware from (URL) Message----- From: John Barnes [mailto:barnes@sensors.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 15:41 To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com Subject: NQC for sale? Did (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Does RIS2.0 set use the fiber optics cable?
|
|
(...) I think it is supposed to connect the USB tower to something, notice the hole in front of the LED that is used in VLL mode. That something might be a CodePilot, MicroScout or Spybotics brick, but I never tried it. Jürgen (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Events in robolab
|
|
(...) As part of some of our robotics outreach work, we have produced various materials that may be of use. Some of the stuff we have got round to putting on the web can be found at: (URL) particular in the resources section towards the end of the (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Does RIS2.0 set use the fiber optics cable?
|
|
(...) Thanks for that info! Unfortunately they seem pretty hard to find on bricklink... (...) It could be used in the same way it is in the spybotics set... (though the spybotics set has a 12L one). Maybe spybotics uses it to send light through (for (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: The BrickOS Task Manager
|
|
IIRC the issue was that Task, Process and Thread were all used to represent the same item/concept in the Kernel code. After some discussion, it was decided that the word Task would be used in all cases. This improves readability, etc... (ie. Task (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: nop in NQC?
|
|
"Brian Davis" <brdavis@iusb.edu> wrote in message news:Hr150r.vu2@lugnet.com... (...) bytecode? I'm (...) timer (...) sequences like: (...) at a (...) the speed (...) inbetween the (...) have one? (...) Opcode 0x10 is effectively a nop when (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC for sale?
|
|
(...) I wasn't aware of this, and I doubt I'll see any financial benefit, but I didn't create NQC for financial gain, and there have been ample rewards in other ways. I also don't mind if other people use NQC for some commercial purpose. I haven't (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: nop in NQC?
|
|
(...) I think all of the single bytecode commands have side effects, which may or may not matter to you. You might want to use UnmuteSound(). Another option would be to create a command that does nothing. For example, a jump to the following (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
