 | | Re: Editing Makefile (adding comman line arguements)
|
|
(...) Mike, You might start off by checking the manual for GNU Make at (URL) just look within the various makefiles within the brickOS code. Try Makefile.commom at brickOS root. Ed (22 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: NQC's future
|
|
Am 2003-12-02 18:13 Uhr schrieb "John Hansen" unter <JohnBinder@aol.com>: (...) There is a MacNCQ from Robert Bate that works very fine. I like it!! (URL) you should contact him by email rbate@mac.com Ralf (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: NQC's future
|
|
(...) By the way, people who have a CD-booting Windows-compatible PC have free Linux too, via a boot CD that works without repartitioning (or even writing) the boot HDD: (URL) I think I specifically remember seeing rcx serial port tools work there, (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
|
 | | Re: to analog as rcx is to programming plastic
|
|
(...) And now the more concise introductory perspective of weeks elapsed and a new age-nine-ish student/ parent pair to experiment with yesterday: Pricey, delicate, delightful: may require an engineer present to play without burning out parts. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Editing Makefile (adding comman line arguements)
|
|
I am trying to edit Makefile in the main brickos dir so that I can access the arguements on the command line when I enter "make _____" to compile the directory. I need to do so because I need to have a certain command execute when the arguements are (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: My problems with adding a Best Fit algorithm for memory management to kernel/mm.c
|
|
(...) Yeah, very true. Those lines where in there becuase of the error I originally had in my code, but since my code changed (and is correct) those lines are not needed). Thanks Mike (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: NQC's future
|
|
(...) I think you are the victim of too much snippage... :-) If you reread the original message, there is indeed mention of adding various Spybot related features but the "non-standard firmware support" was in reference to NQC in general. I assume (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
|
 | | Re: My problems with adding a Best Fit algorithm for memory management to kernel/mm.c
|
|
(...) BTW, you can delete these two lines of intialization (i.e. lines 12 & 15 in the above function) as the intialized value gets clobbered on finding the first suitable sized block: 12) mm_best_free=ptr; 15) mm_best_free++; //this must point to (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: My problems with adding a Best Fit algorithm for memory management to kernel/mm.c
|
|
(...) Sure thing sorry, the problem was that I had the wrong variable in one of the if statement, I copied it over wrong from my hand-written notes I made of the Alg ===...=== void *malloc(size_t size) { size_t *ptr,*next, bestSize, *mm_best_free; (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: NQC's future
|
|
(...) All, I thought that the spybot could not have the firmware replaced. Am I wrong? -Andrea (22 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|