 | | Re: More Speed? Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
|
|
(...) This could be addressed on the existing hardware with a better programming environment. What I have in mind is a new NQC compiler that generates a firmware file instead of a bytecode file. So you would code in NQC (or something like it) and (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More Speed? Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
|
|
how about this cool RCX contest happening in toronto called connect four? (URL) know I'd like more memory to be able to program in more game theory into an RCX. :) (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
|
|
"Chris Phillips" <drvegetable@attbi.com> wrote in message news:Hnvw3v.23z3@lugnet.com... (...) i know this thread shouldn't be any kind of discussion but just to explain my idea i've to say i thought about just possibility to join blue tooth (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More Speed? Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
|
|
(...) I like using NQC because of the simplicity of downloading byte code based programs onto the Lego firmware environment. Using NQC, the CPU would need to be at least 10x to 100x faster to run the kind of programs I would like to run at an (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms 3.0 Wish List
|
|
While this might not be a "need" per se, I'd like to see another option for communication between RCX's than just infrared. Specifically, a port to be used specifically for this purpose, and a communication API. As far as I/O, some kind of bus (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
