To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / *35847 (-10)
  Re: Working motorized focus for Vision Command
 
I have no idea how to access the camera from a programming language, nor do I have any experience in raw vision proccessing. Do you know how to do any of these previously meantioned? Timothy (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Working motorized focus for Vision Command
 
(...) Yes - that'll also make the algorithm run faster. (...) I'm sure it's possible. What I'm not sure about is whether the kind of naive algorithm that I could come up with after just a few minutes thought would be effective. It might take some (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Tempted in buying my first Mindstorms invention kit - 1.5 vs 2.0 ?
 
I have not performed any tests, but if you go in configuration panel, you will see that the USB tower can't be put in long range mode if it is placed behind a passive (non powered) USB hub. That may also be the case for low power laptop usb ports. (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Lego® 9V Technic Motors compared characteristics
 
Hi Gaurav, (...) ;o) (...) I don't own these motors... but I have a friend who has this set, if I can get him to extract the motors from the car I'll post an update... Philo www.philohome.com (23 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Working motorized focus for Vision Command
 
Thanks for replying! I was thinking of the same procedure. But to help with the varried depth problem, a small part of the viewed area could be selected to be the focusing point. So overall, it must be possible, right? Timothy (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Tempted in buying my first Mindstorms invention kit - 1.5 vs 2.0 ?
 
I have one of each RCX (1.0, 1.5 , 2.0) and have tested the signals using a palm app called IRMonitor with little or no difference between the three. This is by no means a "labratory test". Haveyou noticed this with more than one brick? For the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Working motorized focus for Vision Command
 
(...) Well, I'm not an expert - but I imagine it should be possible to produce a measure of how sharp the image is. For example by adding up all the differences between one pixel and it's neighbours. In a sharp image, you'd expect a lot of nice high (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Tempted in buying my first Mindstorms invention kit - 1.5 vs 2.0 ?
 
(...) Actually I've noticed that the 2.0 brick's IR capabilities don't seem to be as strong as the 1.0/1.5 bricks. I don't know why this would be, if something got changed in the hardware? It isn't an issue for most things, but if you want bricks (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: USB IR Tower Linux
 
(...) There's a driver project at (URL) also P C Chan did a patch for BrickOS to support it (URL) (I havent tried either of these) Regards ROSCO (23 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  USB IR Tower Linux
 
Anyone got the USB IR tower shipped in 2.0 to connect to a linux box? If not, are there any specs available so that I can write one? Thanks, Brian Palmer (23 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR