 | | Re: Even better, RIS 1.5, $99.99
|
|
I've been wondering if anybody has any ideas why they chose to go with IR as opposed to RF? The substantial limitations of IR make it highly impracticle for robotics. The only two reasons I can see would be cost or power limitations. I can't imagine (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Even better, RIS 1.5, $99.99
|
|
(...) What makes this REALLY difficult is that the communications medium is error prone - it's all too easy for two robots to get out of IR contact with each other when they are moving around. That makes all the usual protocols very difficult. In (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Even better, RIS 1.5, $99.99
|
|
I have thought about those methods as well, the only problem is when you don't work with the RCX's for just one robot. When you want to try a little bit with AI and interactions between different robots you can't have a master that requests, unless (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Even better, RIS 1.5, $99.99
|
|
(...) That's actually what my 1xRCX + 4xScout system uses. Another way to think of it is "Don't talk until the person before you has finished speaking". If each machine has a number, you can send that number embedded in the message somewhere. The (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Notebook
|
|
(...) Which version of Windoze do you have - Win95 doesn't have USB drivers for example. It seems unlikely that Mitsubishi would build a PC with a USB port that Windoze can't recognise - so it's probably just some ugly Windoze installation problem. (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
