|
|
 | | Re: strange IC files?
|
| (...) I've tried unarchiving the program a couple times, on a couple different machines, which had a couple different copies of IC, with the same results. I'll try it on the PC I have at home, which I haven't gotten around to doing yet. I'm also not (...) (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Re: strange IC files?
|
| i think it would be good if beta users cc'ed their bugs along the handyboard list--I am interested in hearing how it's working but don't have time to bang on it directly. Perhaps others feel the same way. -Fred (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | unarchiving problems w/IC 3.1 for Win 95
|
| I just tried unarchiving IC 3.1 on my 486 at home, running Win 3.1, and Win 32s 1.25.141.0 (or so the win32s.ini file says). I'm having the same problem I had before, where all of the files have an "Inflating: ...." message in front of them. My (...) (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Motor speed table question
|
| Can anyone explain why the values in the _speed_table were chosen. int _speed_table[]= { 0b00000000, /* speed 0 */ 0b00010001, 0b01001001, 0b01010101, 0b01010111, 0b01110111, 0b01111111, 0b11111111 /* speed 7 */ }; Can they be change to a linear (...) (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Re:Motor speed table question
|
| (...) Sure, why not? The way the motor speed table works is that the number is bit shifted out to the motor. Each bit gets the same ammount of time. So if you don't want your motor to move, then you bit shift all zeros. If you want it to run at a (...) (29 years ago, 17-Mar-96, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
