To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.reviewsOpen lugnet.reviews in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Reviews / 242
241  |  243
Subject: 
Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews
Date: 
Fri, 1 Oct 1999 19:28:06 GMT
Viewed: 
213 times
  
In lugnet.reviews, David Eaton writes:
In lugnet.underground, Eric Kingsley writes:
And the grey odd "plate" which forms the base of the vehicle is really
cute.  It looks pretty much like an AT-AT feet, I think.

I agree that it looks like an AT-AT foot but it would be terribly out of
scale I think.  It might work better as an AT-ST or AT-PT foot.

Not to beat the "not to scale" to death, but I was curious the other day, and
calculated the height an AT-AT would be if that piece were used for the feet,
and it was built to scale with the 'foot's width... It'd be about 20
centimeters tall. Pretty durn short if you ask me...

Anyway... too small. An AT-PT foot might look great, tho! Anyone know what the
scale "should" be for an AT-PT?

I believe it is about 3 meters tall.  Dunno how tall it'd be in Lego though.

Jeff



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
 
(...) Not to beat the "not to scale" to death, but I was curious the other day, and calculated the height an AT-AT would be if that piece were used for the feet, and it was built to scale with the 'foot's width... It'd be about 20 centimeters tall. (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR