 | | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Christmas. (...) Scott, I am not a castle builder, but recently came accross seven of these sets[1]. In my opinion, this set has TONS of cool pieces, especially if you are going to build your own castles. It has lots of sloped bricks, arches, (...) (25 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Hm. I haven't gotten around to re-assembling that one to write a review of it yet. Maybe I'll do that this weekend, along with the Royal Drawbridge. From memory, though, the castle is fairly nice. Some interesting large wall segments (6x6x6 (...) (25 years ago, 4-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Then by all means, pick one up! (or two - you can never have too much Lego<grin>) James (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Great, thanks! We have a few of the ninja sets and he does not seem to play with them nearly as much as the castles I have built from scratch. My thought it that this set is not going to be around for much longer and if I want one I should get (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Here's a couple reviews: (URL) another quick opinion, from a castle freak: It's a good set. Not as good as some of the older castle sets, but bigger than most, with a good selection of parts, some of which are rare or unique to this set. (a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
I was completely out of the LEGO scene during the castle sets and am considering purchasing a 6090 Royal Knights Castle for my son for Christmas. I am curious as to others reviews of this set and if it would make a nice addition to our collection. (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Go here for the RTL format document: (URL) joshua (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) D'oh! Ah...that's okay. What I plan on doing is setting up an area that uses Pause's sectioning, and a "meta" review section to review reviewers and the site. Would some one be willing to send me a *text* template for a review? Since I won't (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) What's to negotiate? You have experience with FoM, you know Perl, and your connection is probably just as fast as directhosting claims theirs is. Even if I hosted the FoM, which I'd be happy to do, I'd want to give you admin access to it since (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) till I die, too. Wanna negotiate? How about we both spend a little time and see which is better, contributing cool ideas to the one that gets picked? Ciao! (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Heck, who needs sleep? It's up, just to give people something to look at, I guess. I'm too tired to think about applying it to anything right now, but if there is a desire to use it for some Lego-related purpose and someone else can help (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Yup, and like I said - my domain will have a hosting home for a long time. And unless I suddenly go bankrupt, it'll have a good home like it has now with full Perl usage, etc. Heck, even if I did go broke I could move it to a free place that (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Not thinking of it; already offered it. (...) Why do you say it's a bad idea? Every section of the LUGNET website (not just /reviews/) can use a curator or a set of co-curators for content and links organization. (Currently, I'm curating all (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) I'm pushing Todd's hot button on purpose here a bit, but I suspect that even though it's GPL he might not host it because Todd has a bit of NIH, which is what I was referring to vis-a-vis cathedral vs. bazaar. I bet he'd link to it if you (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Well, if it needs to be hosted elsewhere I can do that. I can also look into giving a single trustworthy person limited telnet access to my account to actually install and get it working. Or Todd can host it and I can just use it. :) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
Ya! I like this. Todd told me offline he's thinking of empowering someone to do some content organization in the /reviews/ part of LUGNET. Bad idea. This is somewhere where the bazaar method is presenting us a ready made answer, although it isn't (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) If this is something I could install or have installed on my domain (guarded-inn.com) and then let someone else have the responsibility for maintaining it, I wouldn't mind hosting it. Since this would all be text (or mostly) I can't see space (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) --snipped-- (...) that sounds like it has good potential...i'd just be concerned with how permanent such a site is, how much space we'd have, and how to protect contributors' ownership rights. have others dealt with faqomatic sites? ..joseph g (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Hmmmmm......I Could do all that with just a faqomatic site. Then I could dish out access to people who showed promise. Or I could allow free access, and have moderators. Anyone have ideas? I could set up a working site in a day. A snazzy one (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) I know that Larry's post is in response to Jeff Johnston's original post but I wanted to share my ideas on the matter. I'm quite bummed about the way things have gone at adequate.com. I edited around twenty reviews that have been waiting to be (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
