 | | Re: Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
|
|
Ka-On Lee wrote in message ... (...) 15 (...) set (...) Hmm, a chance to contribute. I will try to do a review of the 8445, I am also interested in hearing other peoples thoughts on this kit. I was both happy with and disapointed with it, I will try (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 'Classic Train'?
|
|
Yup, if you mean 3225, I posted a review and it is earlier in this very group. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Review of 'Classic Train'?
|
|
Does anyone have a review of this set? It's int he latest S@H catalog, and while I'm not really a trainhead, this one looks pretty cool. Comments? (I don't mind that it doesn't come with track or a speed regulator. I don't have the space to set it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
|
|
Ok here is my first post to Lugnet. It is the first technic set I get in 15 years and it is my first review, so please forgive me for any mistakes. :) Also I tend to be harsh when rating my LEGO sets. I haven't seen a LEGO set that I would call it (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
Jeff Johnston wrote in message <37D07585.A947B4B5@m...ne.net>... (...) Actually, the biggest raised base plate I'm aware of is the 48x48 base plate in 5808 (there is one annoying thing about this plate, it has two rounded corners, with a radius of (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Troy, I think you're referring to 6097, Night Lord's Castle, as opposed to the other one Scott was talking about, 6090 Royal Knight's Castle. Bryan (25 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Christmas. (...) Scott, I am not a castle builder, but recently came accross seven of these sets[1]. In my opinion, this set has TONS of cool pieces, especially if you are going to build your own castles. It has lots of sloped bricks, arches, (...) (25 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Hm. I haven't gotten around to re-assembling that one to write a review of it yet. Maybe I'll do that this weekend, along with the Royal Drawbridge. From memory, though, the castle is fairly nice. Some interesting large wall segments (6x6x6 (...) (25 years ago, 4-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Then by all means, pick one up! (or two - you can never have too much Lego<grin>) James (URL) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Great, thanks! We have a few of the ninja sets and he does not seem to play with them nearly as much as the castles I have built from scratch. My thought it that this set is not going to be around for much longer and if I want one I should get (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Here's a couple reviews: (URL) another quick opinion, from a castle freak: It's a good set. Not as good as some of the older castle sets, but bigger than most, with a good selection of parts, some of which are rare or unique to this set. (a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
I was completely out of the LEGO scene during the castle sets and am considering purchasing a 6090 Royal Knights Castle for my son for Christmas. I am curious as to others reviews of this set and if it would make a nice addition to our collection. (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Go here for the RTL format document: (URL) joshua (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) D'oh! Ah...that's okay. What I plan on doing is setting up an area that uses Pause's sectioning, and a "meta" review section to review reviewers and the site. Would some one be willing to send me a *text* template for a review? Since I won't (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) What's to negotiate? You have experience with FoM, you know Perl, and your connection is probably just as fast as directhosting claims theirs is. Even if I hosted the FoM, which I'd be happy to do, I'd want to give you admin access to it since (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) till I die, too. Wanna negotiate? How about we both spend a little time and see which is better, contributing cool ideas to the one that gets picked? Ciao! (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Heck, who needs sleep? It's up, just to give people something to look at, I guess. I'm too tired to think about applying it to anything right now, but if there is a desire to use it for some Lego-related purpose and someone else can help (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Yup, and like I said - my domain will have a hosting home for a long time. And unless I suddenly go bankrupt, it'll have a good home like it has now with full Perl usage, etc. Heck, even if I did go broke I could move it to a free place that (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Not thinking of it; already offered it. (...) Why do you say it's a bad idea? Every section of the LUGNET website (not just /reviews/) can use a curator or a set of co-curators for content and links organization. (Currently, I'm curating all (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) I'm pushing Todd's hot button on purpose here a bit, but I suspect that even though it's GPL he might not host it because Todd has a bit of NIH, which is what I was referring to vis-a-vis cathedral vs. bazaar. I bet he'd link to it if you (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
