 | | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
(...) Here's a couple reviews: (URL) another quick opinion, from a castle freak: It's a good set. Not as good as some of the older castle sets, but bigger than most, with a good selection of parts, some of which are rare or unique to this set. (a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
I was completely out of the LEGO scene during the castle sets and am considering purchasing a 6090 Royal Knights Castle for my son for Christmas. I am curious as to others reviews of this set and if it would make a nice addition to our collection. (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Go here for the RTL format document: (URL) joshua (25 years ago, 25-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) D'oh! Ah...that's okay. What I plan on doing is setting up an area that uses Pause's sectioning, and a "meta" review section to review reviewers and the site. Would some one be willing to send me a *text* template for a review? Since I won't (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) What's to negotiate? You have experience with FoM, you know Perl, and your connection is probably just as fast as directhosting claims theirs is. Even if I hosted the FoM, which I'd be happy to do, I'd want to give you admin access to it since (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) till I die, too. Wanna negotiate? How about we both spend a little time and see which is better, contributing cool ideas to the one that gets picked? Ciao! (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Heck, who needs sleep? It's up, just to give people something to look at, I guess. I'm too tired to think about applying it to anything right now, but if there is a desire to use it for some Lego-related purpose and someone else can help (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Yup, and like I said - my domain will have a hosting home for a long time. And unless I suddenly go bankrupt, it'll have a good home like it has now with full Perl usage, etc. Heck, even if I did go broke I could move it to a free place that (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Not thinking of it; already offered it. (...) Why do you say it's a bad idea? Every section of the LUGNET website (not just /reviews/) can use a curator or a set of co-curators for content and links organization. (Currently, I'm curating all (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) I'm pushing Todd's hot button on purpose here a bit, but I suspect that even though it's GPL he might not host it because Todd has a bit of NIH, which is what I was referring to vis-a-vis cathedral vs. bazaar. I bet he'd link to it if you (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Well, if it needs to be hosted elsewhere I can do that. I can also look into giving a single trustworthy person limited telnet access to my account to actually install and get it working. Or Todd can host it and I can just use it. :) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
Ya! I like this. Todd told me offline he's thinking of empowering someone to do some content organization in the /reviews/ part of LUGNET. Bad idea. This is somewhere where the bazaar method is presenting us a ready made answer, although it isn't (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) If this is something I could install or have installed on my domain (guarded-inn.com) and then let someone else have the responsibility for maintaining it, I wouldn't mind hosting it. Since this would all be text (or mostly) I can't see space (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) --snipped-- (...) that sounds like it has good potential...i'd just be concerned with how permanent such a site is, how much space we'd have, and how to protect contributors' ownership rights. have others dealt with faqomatic sites? ..joseph g (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Hmmmmm......I Could do all that with just a faqomatic site. Then I could dish out access to people who showed promise. Or I could allow free access, and have moderators. Anyone have ideas? I could set up a working site in a day. A snazzy one (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) I know that Larry's post is in response to Jeff Johnston's original post but I wanted to share my ideas on the matter. I'm quite bummed about the way things have gone at adequate.com. I edited around twenty reviews that have been waiting to be (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) I did, and it hasn't. Yet, anyway. But this is a hobby, he may not have gotten round to it yet. :-) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | 4561 Railway Express newbie review
|
|
I built the 4561 train over the weekend and offer the following observations. I am a newbie to trains so please know that my comments are relative. 1.) The supply of windows is great. 2.) The amount of track-- relative to the length of the train-- (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
(...) Ahh, cool, and here it is... (URL) THE review format. :) (...) If you posted it to RTL, then the place I'd would expect it to have shown up would be on Joshua's site, at the rec.toys.lego LEGO Set Review Archive: (URL) you posted it using THE (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
Be sure to include in your 8448 review: "...truly inspired by the 956, but built with the structural nuances of the 8480 Space Shuttle. Definately not another 8880, but strangely that's a plus." KL (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
