Subject:
|
Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish.photography
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 22:27:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3169 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish.photography, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> Here's a link to the review from Steve's Digicams.
> http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/nikon2100.html
Very detailed information, yes. But I have yet to see a negative review of
the cameras I have researched there -- and the lack of negative remarks
makes me wonder about their conclusions. IIRC, the site is very closely
linked to Ritz Cameras online. Makes one wonder...
I figure you can't go wrong with some of the better Nikons either way.
It'll all be obsolete in a few years anyway...
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
| (...) Here's a link to the review from Steve's Digicams. (URL) in the market for a Digital Camera will want to check out the reviews there: it is my first stop when looking for a new camera. The review does note a macro-mode (close-up) of 1.6 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
