 | | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) Here's a link to the review from Steve's Digicams. (URL) in the market for a Digital Camera will want to check out the reviews there: it is my first stop when looking for a new camera. The review does note a macro-mode (close-up) of 1.6 (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) Well, whatever it is Troy is using, here is a picture of it as well as a picture of how it pictures-- (URL) C. (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | RE: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) Actually, I have the 990, which is one model earlier than the 995. Troy is using a Canon EOS D10 these days. I'm quite happy with all the features on my camera...manual/automatic focus, f-stop, shutter speed, white balance, flash, etc. The (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) Bram, as well as Troy Cefaratti, both have the Coolpix 995, and I have the Coolpix 4500 (which is basically the 995's followup). They're the split-body design, and I love my camera dearly. They are more mid-to top of the line than the camera (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
"Aaron Muhl" <Aaron_Muhl@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HDu527.oEJ@lugnet.com... (...) camera (...) Don't use it but I know Bram uses a Coolpix camera. He's been a bit un-Lugnet lately due to school (so he most likely won't see this) but you might (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) You could set the Followups back to lugnet.publish.photography when you do things like that, theres always the risk of annoying ppl.. See this review: (URL) sure you can find a lot more if you search the 'net. Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
Since I'm not really getting anywhere in publish.photography, I was wondering if the two largest groups could comment. Anybody used this camera listed below? Thanks, Aaron "Aaron Muhl" <Aaron_Muhl@yahoo.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) My USB camera (Kodak DC4800) appears as a new drive in Windoze which is very convenient since I can use any file manager to get the photos out of the camera. So no need for any extra card reader there. I could also use the camera as file (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) Regardless of which camera you choose, invest the $20 to get one of those dedicated USB memory card readers. I find this to be a very convenient way to get pictures out of my cameras without being tied to whatever upload software comes with (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
I've finally decided to get with the 21st Century and purchase a digital camera. After doing quite a bit of reading at various sites, I think I've found the camera that will fit my needs. I'm looking for a camera around $200.00 that has at least 3x (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
