Subject:
|
Re: Picture file sizes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 03:39:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
932 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Oct 1998 16:44:01 GMT, "Larry Pieniazek" <lpien@ctp.com>
wrote:
> While I LOVE ULV-17, the model and the site, I would have liked it better if it
> had about 1/3 to 1/4 as many pages, same number of images.
>
> That's my opinion. I KNOW others differ and you can't please everyone. Put it
> in your input hopper and stir it around.
I gnawed on that question for a while. Finally I opted for fewer
pictures per page just to keep it cleaner, with less scrolling
required.
I also attempted to balance the image loading times with the average
time taken to read the descriptive text, thereby achieving a synergy
of written comprehension and visual discovery. (1)
Page design sure is a learning process. And a pain in the butt.
-- Terry K --
(1) How's that for a load of B.S.? :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Picture file sizes
|
| (...) Yup. Keep in mind that there is a strong contingent in your readership that doesn't really care for thumbnails. I want to see your page, laid out and designed to present the information to me in a coherent story, not just a grid of thumbnails (...) (26 years ago, 17-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
