Subject:
|
Re: Picture file sizes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Oct 1998 06:28:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
768 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Oct 1998 02:11:40 GMT, "Linc Smith"
<ldsmith@pfc.forestry.ca> wrote:
> If I want to publish a picture on the web, what file size should I be
> shooting for. Can anyone give me some guide lines of what is excessive
> size, what is good?
>
> Thanks
>
> LINC
I try to keep file sizes at less than 50k - preferably in the range
of 10K to 30K. Typically, you should be able to get a picture that is
around 600x400 or less in size down to less than 40K and still end up
with a good JPG image.
Do your best to be ruthless - experiment with saving a file with
varying levels of compression. Keep compressing until the quality is
unacceptable, then back off a little.
And crop out as much unnecessary space as possible.
And remember, there is never a good reason to have a screen sized JPG
picture that is over 100K in size. That is just a huge waste of
bandwidth.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Picture file sizes
|
| If I want to publish a picture on the web, what file size should I be shooting for. Can anyone give me some guide lines of what is excessive size, what is good? Thanks LINC (26 years ago, 16-Oct-98, to lugnet.publish)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
