 | | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Try clicking one of the hexagons, silly. (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Could stand to be dialed down a bit IMHO. (...) This isn't .space... try less smack, doofus(1). Smack is out of place in .publish... and a lot of other places on LUGNET too, unless you're sure it's friendly banter. See the ToS if you're (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Why should I do that? They're just hexagons - they don't say what they're for or where they go. You mean I should just click stuff willy-nilly when it's not clear what it's for? If the point of a web site is to disseminate information, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Well the "Best Ever" thing was rather a joke, but I'll let it slide... What I would do is first think hmm this is rather interesting, what are these hexagons for? Then I'd put my mouse over them and note the color change. Each hex has a (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Kevin Blocksidge wrote: -snip- (...) Then how about loosing the "piss and vinegar" approach and being nice for a change. Then we can honestly congradulate you all for your fine efforts. e (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: NeutronBot.com ::: Best Site Ever
|
|
(...) Seconded. Some folks can't handle a little criticism, even if the "constructiveness" is somewhat tongue-in-cheek. For the record, Kevoh, I think the creations on the site are cool. The overall look and feel of the site is good, too. But the (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-05, to lugnet.publish)
|
