 | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) Why have a centralized server? I'd expect there be a list of feeds someplace, and maybe mirroring of feeds... But it would make a lot of sense to have each feed hosted off the service that generates it. Unless LENNI wants to support remote (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I saw a centralised server as an aggregator, not the primary source of the original content. I think there's a desire to be able to aggregate feeds from many places and present them blended together. Once aggregated, some specific filtering (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | | (...) That's pretty much what I'm thinking too... provide tools for anybody to publish LENNI-enhanced feeds from their own sources, and provide other tools for readers, either web-based or desktop/compiled. And as a side benefit, I also see the (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —René Hoffmeister
|
| | | | (...) Hm. I guess there is a misunderstanding somewhere (and I think it's caused by language barriers, sorry, I simply don't know how to translate individual technical descriptions). But I'll try one more time. It would be ridiculous if we couldn't (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | (...) [SNIP] (...) I agree, one centralized area would be an excellent resource, one which LENNI could accomplish easily, I believe. That's a big part of why I think something like this should be created. Let me expand my assumptions on the project (...) (20 years ago, 29-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
