 | | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Pft. You don't need to do that - just need to add a <link> tag (I believe) to the header and you're all set. Don't even need to make it smart - all the pages can point to a css that's really a dynamic file, and that will output content based (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Jennifer, CSS is super-easy to learn - pretty much just one line of ASP and one or two text files containing a few lines of definitions. How to let the user pick is not something I've had experience with. My home website ((URL) uses a CSS (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Sounds reasonable, although it would probably be difficult to retrofit, given that the rendered images on the website have black rather than transparent backgrounds and would not look correct. The fact that I know nothing about CSS would make (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) I prefer the light on dark colorscheme. But I'd recommend just having several CSS files lying about, and allow the user to pick which one is used (or even use their own :) But that's just me :) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) The models do take a very long time (many months), and sometimes I can spend days on relatively trivial parts like the upper part of the cab, and then change it to something else entirely later. It's just an incremental thing really, I don't (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it the End of Creations Rotule's website ?
|
|
(...) Well, following the advice my wife gave me, I've decided to keep the website. It will get a totally new image though, but I think it will be for the best. I'll keep the best features, I'll drop one or two, add one or two and everything should (...) (21 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Virtual LEGO now available!
|
|
(...) I ordered mine from No Starch and it arrived within 7 days and cost around $50 Aus. My opinion of the book? Excellent. I originally downloaded the all in one installer and could not get some parts of it to work, with the chapter on software (...) (21 years ago, 17-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.books, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) My guess is that they wanted the picture for one of those mundane pieces on marriage that both Women's and Men's magazines do all the time. I figure they'd photoshop in a minifig bride and groom and have a novel illustration. Just my (...) (21 years ago, 14-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) Could be worse--Amy could have been approached by (URL) The National Review.> Now that's perverse! Dave! FUT: OT.fun (because I don't intend my jest to start a big debate) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) Need we assume that their intent is to mock, though? I recall seeing the LEGO-compatible Tyco Superblocks Phone (as shown (URL)) in a "cool stuff" column in Playboy about fifteen years ago. In that article, the phone was quite highly (and (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) Hmmm. Perhaps a little diversification? : (URL) Perversion knows no boundaries. JOHN (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) Or as a 'feature' of women with odd hobbies... Not that *we* think it's odd, of course!! (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) To make fun of us all in a snide way, would be my guess, if it's the sort of mags I'm thinking of... (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Mens' magazines
|
|
I've had two "mens' magazines" ask me for hi-res pictures of my church. They seem to assume I'll be delighted with the request. One offered monetary compensation, the other apparently thought I'd be so delighted they'd just offer copies of the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it the End of Creations Rotule's website ?
|
|
Terry, I like your site but don't visit it that often, I tend to forget about it. It does not have enough new material each day to draw me back on a regular basis and when you post about new stuff here at Lugnet I'm usually there checking it out - (...) (21 years ago, 6-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it the End of Creations Rotule's website ?
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) Of course I care! I've had some pretty cool captions & top 10's posted. I love that stuff! (Yup that's me Jeff Szklennik!) (...) Jeff (21 years ago, 6-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Web Host Concept
|
|
(...) To answer the question, it will be unlimited. But I don't think you can generalize and say "everything will soon be gone". Do you think you could build a website that has even 1GB of stuff on it? Even my entire collection of downloaded (...) (21 years ago, 6-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Web Host Concept
|
|
The problem with this model is that the "organization" has a certain limited amount of space, let's say 100 GB for example. Now, let's say two people join. Do you give them each 50 GB? Then no one else can sign on. Or do you give them 10 GB to use, (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.animation)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it the End of Creations Rotule's website ?
|
|
(...) Yep, keeping a website up and running is a lot of work to do it right. And paying for it is that much more of a hassle. Do what you want, it's your site. I've always enjoyed the minifig hall of fame and the posters (especially the posters) and (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Web Host Concept
|
|
Sure, with that kind of thoughts, we are going forward a s a society! Why bother trying something new when we can give our money to huge companies that already have al we need? Heck, why bother risking a few bucks a month when I can throw my money (...) (21 years ago, 5-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
