 | | Re: New vs. Old
|
|
(...) Head...spinning...gaaaa ok, fine. :P Play Well ~T (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New vs. Old
|
|
XFUT .publish (...) I wasn't really going after sigs in particular...I was more concerned with things like: (*fffffffssjjsshshsh...hhtttttt*) which show up as an even bigger mess: (*fffffffssjjsshshsh...hhtttttt*) when you're reading in plain text, (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | FTX table questions...
|
|
Todd, Is there anyway to get some of the fancier FTX features to work inside an FTX table? For example, can I put a list or a section heading inside a table? This just makes my list disappear: ~ my table cell + one + two + three ie my table cell one (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing with pictures
|
|
(...) (URL) Dan Boger dan@peeron.com (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Testing with pictures
|
|
Moved to .publishing... (...) You have to get a reasonably decent image-editing program. Plain 'ol paint doesn't cut it, and neither will most of the included microsoft 'imaging' software. You might be able to add simple text, but not much else. (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
It is summer time, not lego time (= winter time), so I haven't felt this before now. I haven't seen this in my newsreader, but I can imagine that it might look really funny/odd. But leaving that of, here is my first suggestion: I will only post (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Mo'betta Mo'betta pics of on biomechanicalbricks.com
|
|
Mo'betta pics of me, the Jamocklaquat, and the Little Bots Series. All New Photography! Please have a look. (URL) Brighter Jama Picture:> (URL) 7 Little Sort Bots:> (2 URLs) me:> More goodies soon. e <www.biomechanicalbricks.com> (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: // and ** vs {} and [] (was: testing in rtl...)
|
|
(...) I see. With extensive modifications, I assume? I'm sure there's a way to link libperl.so to CNews but that could be unweildy to say the least. (...) Sorry I can't view the FTX results of that on my browser. But I assume that's right. (...) I (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: // and ** vs {} and [] (was: testing in rtl...)
|
|
(...) CNews. (...) Doesn't that look a bit redundant? /italics/ and *boldface* What do underlined underlines look like? Like this?-- _N_ew _E_ngland _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup Not sure how either any of those are an improvement. --Todd (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: // and ** vs {} and [] (was: testing in rtl...)
|
|
(...) What NNTP server do you use? I was under the impression that it was written in Perl itself. [...] (...) How about a different interpretation - // and ** (and don't forget __ for underlining) might not be interpreted the same as the {} and [] (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
