 | | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) I dunno about him, but when I first looked at his post, there was a blank space where the article now appears. Looking now, I see the article. slow load, maybe? James (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) I am also very happy, except for.... (...) this. At least on my computer, the rainbow of colors are all just a bit too light/faint. It is very difficult to read some of the text. I would like to blame it on my own moniter, but everything else (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Todd, I enounter an anomaly in Outlook Express (6.00.26) with FTX-formatted posts, as OE seems to think every such post has an attachment (showing the paper clip symbol in the thread view). This is not a serious problem, but a bit irritating, as (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) This is terrible news! How is this going to be rendered on a text-based newsreader? Not everyone is using a GUI for NNTP you know! --Bill. XFUT: lugnet.admin.nntp (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: testing in rtl...
|
|
(...) I mean that sentences are still perfectly readable. (...) Right -- it's just an extension to plain text. (...) Not any more than a newsreader should recognize that: hello I'm going to *shout* now should change to: hello I'm going to shout now (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) d'Oh! (...) Yes. (...) d'Oh! (...) Sorry about that! I think I can fix that. (...) My apologies -- I didn't realize that newsreaders would have a problem with the content-type tag. I'll figure out some different headers that will make it work (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Previews? Like when you're posting? That preview? Or do you mean the brief abstract article displays? (...) Mmmm, good idea. (...) What didn't work? I see the article you linked to. Did it not show up in when you previewed prior to posting? (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Brian, What if there were an option you could set which prevented the inline display of images that are larger than some size you specify? --Todd (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
For me, who reads LUGNet in e-mail form, the FTX enhancements can get quite confusing. I can live with the markup for italics, bold, underline, but when the computer commands for links and things are included, I begin to lose interest in someone's (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... <a blank message with an attachment> Todd, are these FTX messages supposed to show in newsreaders? Because right now OE shows a blank message with an attachment. I REALLY, REALLY hate the idea of having to open an (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
|
(...) Sorry... I am very stupide!!! see now... (I wasn't trying to x-post just to get more views) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
|
retesting in Publish (for FTX) (...) Trains and Robotics can finally reach a common goal... :) ---...--- (...) In Other News, ---...--- (...) (URL) (...) (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) I'd like to see FTX special characters on message previews stripped. When viewing via the web interface, I see the special characters that create the formatted text. The brief message previews should be all plain text with those characters (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) My main concern is the extra time it takes to download messages containing in-line images rather than links to images. This is especially worrisome when using the Entire Thread on One Page or the This Message and its Replies on one Page (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
~^> This time the (URL) Right Way> · Eric Sophie Can you name these People? (URL) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Hey! I made that! It's called the (URL) Zolqwith I like this new feature! A great day in Lugnet History! Thank you Todd· Eric Sophie (...) (URL) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Of course, it make perfect sense now. Its Definately Bed Time Now The novelty will wear off right? -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) ROFL! Hey, I could've left Henry's mugshot up there, but I thought I'd try something a bit smaller. Now just imagine the confusion I could have caused by linking to the help pages. ;) (...) -Dave (who's done experimenting for the day) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) LOL, no... +X is what you'd have to write if you wanted to cajole a count-up list + into counting downward. If you just want a count-up list, you can use + without the X number, like this: + foo + bar + zot which results in: foo bar zot --Todd (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Aw, hey, man, don't do that...you're gonna make someone's brain melt. --Todd (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
