 | | RE: Picture piracy on lego.com
|
|
Sorry if this sounds harsh--it isn't meant to be. (...) One of the great thing about the DAT file format is that it's plain text. How can you make part of a text file unremovable? Secondly, lego.com never deals with DAT files, so this would solve no (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture piracy on lego.com
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <BXL34@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:MABBIBJJFOJIOHD...wru.edu... (...) never (...) Yeah. But if Artemis ever does become a reality - the new file format could be encoded and a 'parts author status' could be granted and (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture piracy on lego.com
|
|
well youll probably be shocked but let me thank you. It was just a thought to throw into the arena. Please realize that my technical knowledge exists in the realm of litle to none in technical formatting matters. There is no easy solution to this if (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture piracy on lego.com
|
|
One of the beauties of the 5x5 pixel idea is that there is no cost. It would simply be a small selection of pixels that would be put into the image by the author into a field of like colored pixels. this allows for about 32 million different (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture piracy on lego.com
|
|
(...) I think this solution loses more than is gained. Open file formats are a good thing and it'd be a shame to lose that -- especially when it'd be easy to "fix" any image with a graphics program anyway. (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture piracy on lego.com
|
|
(...) The problem with this kind of mark is that it's easily lost if the the image is resized or even jpeg encoded. (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
