 | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll
|
|
(...) Nah, that's not true -- font sizes are a good way to denote the relative importance of various bits of text. A legal disclaimer or copyright notice may be important, but conceptually, it's not the focus of the page, so it should be made (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Screen Resolution Poll
|
|
(...) Simple. Monitors are approximately 4x3, so the resolutions should be too. Otherwise, bitmapped pictures get stretched or squished -- in the case of 1280x1024, squished by about 7%. (...) CSS provides a great way to do this -- it has both (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Screen Resolution Poll
|
|
(...) Don't think so. For fine print on paper there is the (weak) excuse that one wants to save paper. This doesn't exist for the web. The main reason for fine print is of course that people don't won't you to read it, to screw you later if you make (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Screen Resolution Poll
|
|
(...) 'nuff said! I use mostly 1280x1024 and my Netscape is about two-thirds of the screen wide and as long as it can be. Works just fine. Ppl. complaining about to long rows, just narrow the browser a tad, problem solved. /Tobbe (25 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Screen Resolution Poll
|
|
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8q0eg8.shl.....bu.edu... (...) than (...) :) You'll have to explain a little more to me about resolutions and pixel shapes when I'm out at Gordon. I'd like square pixels too :) (...) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
