| |
What in the way of dislaimer should I post on the site? I was wodering about
this before I put it together, but wasn't sure what I should do. Would
something like this be appropriate:
Set Number Disclaimer
The set numbers used on this website are fictional and are not sponsored by the
LEGO group of companies.
LEGO® Disclaimer
This is an unofficial LEGO® web site. LEGO® is a trademark of the LEGO Group of
companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this site. You can visit
the official LEGO® site here.
Thanks for all of the wisdom Todd,
Pat J
In lugnet.space, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.space, Patrick Justison writes:
> > Its not done and only a couple of the links from the main page work, but • here
> > ya' go! I suck at waiting until things are finished before showing them.
> >
> > http://lightning.prohosting.com/~pjbrick/pjblacktron.html
>
> Beautiful stuff! That APC looks even tougher than the APC in _Aliens_! :-)
>
> What's up with the set numbers (6967, 6978, 6976, 6918, 6855)? Isn't that
> going a bit far (seriously) without heavy disclaimers near each one letting
> people know that these aren't official sets? These models are so incredible,
> if I was a new Space collector and didn't know that they weren't real sets,
> I'd be mighty bummed when I found out the hard way. :-(
>
> Wicked excellent use of 1x2 tile arrows for forward/backward navigation!!!
> Great idea!!!
>
> Love the gun.html page! I can hear the Rocket/Grenade Launcher going
> "foonk . . . . kablooie! . . . foonk . . . . . . Kablammm!" :-)
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Blacktron Website
|
| (...) IANAL (I Am Not A Lawyer) and this is not legal advice, but the safest thing to do (IMHO) would simply be not to use 4-digit LEGO set numbers -- not just from a legal standpoint but also from a viewer confusion standpoint. Some other hard (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Blacktron Website
|
| (...) What's up with the set numbers (6967, 6978, 6976, 6918, 6855)? Isn't that going a bit far (seriously) without heavy disclaimers near each one letting people know that these aren't official sets? These models are so incredible, if I was a new (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
