Subject:
|
Re: Millennium City
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:18:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
907 times
|
| |
|
|
"Sanjay D'Souza" <sds87@hotmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for the info Bram. At over 300kbs I felt the map was larger in
> size than it should have been. Hope you don't mind me using your copy.
Go ahead.
> I'd interested in finding out how you got the file size so small
> without a correspondingly large decrease in quality.
I'm not sure :) Maybe Corel Photopaint 8 has better JPG compression than
most other programs...it also has a preview, so I can adjust easily
adjust the compression to a nice file-size vs. quality.
> I'm limited to only 5mb on my website so reducing the file sizes
> not only speeds up loading time but will also ensures I can save
> more image files.
Maybe some of my images are too compressed, but I try to keep icons and
other small images to 1 Kb, Thumbnails to less than 3 Kb, medium size
images (say, 200x150 pixels) to less than 10 Kb and 640x480 images to
around 50 Kb.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Millennium City
|
| Thanks for the info Bram. At over 300kbs I felt the map was larger in size than it should have been. Hope you don't mind me using your copy. I'd interested in finding out how you got the file size so small without a correspondingly large decrease in (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
