 | | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Pft. You don't need to do that - just need to add a <link> tag (I believe) to the header and you're all set. Don't even need to make it smart - all the pages can point to a css that's really a dynamic file, and that will output content based (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Jennifer, CSS is super-easy to learn - pretty much just one line of ASP and one or two text files containing a few lines of definitions. How to let the user pick is not something I've had experience with. My home website ((URL) uses a CSS (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) Sounds reasonable, although it would probably be difficult to retrofit, given that the rendered images on the website have black rather than transparent backgrounds and would not look correct. The fact that I know nothing about CSS would make (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) I prefer the light on dark colorscheme. But I'd recommend just having several CSS files lying about, and allow the user to pick which one is used (or even use their own :) But that's just me :) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: JCB JS220 Excavator
|
|
(...) The models do take a very long time (many months), and sometimes I can spend days on relatively trivial parts like the upper part of the cab, and then change it to something else entirely later. It's just an incremental thing really, I don't (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: can someone tell me how to make my photos come out better?
|
|
(...) Use a manual white balance reading if you have to. As long as there is no interfering sunlight or other light color type, the images should be fine. -jHk (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: can someone tell me how to make my photos come out better?
|
|
Some- well alot- of it is your camera- fixed focus 4 feet to infinity ain't going to do very well in the macro realm. Something like the $200 canon A60 would do a lot better in getting closer. Just resist the urge to get closer then 4 feet. Crop if (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish.photography, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: can someone tell me how to make my photos come out better?
|
|
(...) Some additions to what Chris said. Not all light is created equal. I used to flood my models with incandescent light bulbs, which would put a very heavy yellow tinge on my pictures. When I moved to my new build space I put up natural light (...) (21 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: can someone tell me how to make my photos come out better?
|
|
(...) Well I am not familiar with that particular camera, but I've been struggling to improve my digital photography skills literally since the day BrickShelf was announced on LUGNET. Here are a few tips I've picked up so far: Use more light! Borrow (...) (21 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish.photography, FTX)
|
| |
| | can someone tell me how to make my photos come out better?
|
|
My camera is: Concord EyeQ Duo LCD 1.3 megapixels 2x digital zoom 9.9mm f/3.2 flash the manual says its "focus free from 4 feet to infinity" No matter what I do, I cant get it to take good photos of my lego creations. Examples of how the photos have (...) (21 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it the End of Creations Rotule's website ?
|
|
(...) Well, following the advice my wife gave me, I've decided to keep the website. It will get a totally new image though, but I think it will be for the best. I'll keep the best features, I'll drop one or two, add one or two and everything should (...) (21 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | LEGO Track Geometry page
|
|
I've put together a page with some of my thoughts about LEGO track geometry. Please take a look and tell me what you think! (URL) --Bill. (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.publish.html, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Virtual LEGO now available!
|
|
(...) I ordered mine from No Starch and it arrived within 7 days and cost around $50 Aus. My opinion of the book? Excellent. I originally downloaded the all in one installer and could not get some parts of it to work, with the chapter on software (...) (21 years ago, 17-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.books, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) My guess is that they wanted the picture for one of those mundane pieces on marriage that both Women's and Men's magazines do all the time. I figure they'd photoshop in a minifig bride and groom and have a novel illustration. Just my (...) (21 years ago, 14-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) Could be worse--Amy could have been approached by (URL) The National Review.> Now that's perverse! Dave! FUT: OT.fun (because I don't intend my jest to start a big debate) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) Need we assume that their intent is to mock, though? I recall seeing the LEGO-compatible Tyco Superblocks Phone (as shown (URL)) in a "cool stuff" column in Playboy about fifteen years ago. In that article, the phone was quite highly (and (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) Hmmm. Perhaps a little diversification? : (URL) Perversion knows no boundaries. JOHN (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) Or as a 'feature' of women with odd hobbies... Not that *we* think it's odd, of course!! (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Mens' magazines
|
|
(...) To make fun of us all in a snide way, would be my guess, if it's the sort of mags I'm thinking of... (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Mens' magazines
|
|
I've had two "mens' magazines" ask me for hi-res pictures of my church. They seem to assume I'll be delighted with the request. One offered monetary compensation, the other apparently thought I'd be so delighted they'd just offer copies of the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
