 | | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) LOL... I'm sure the novelty will wear off after a while. --Todd (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Oops. didn't mean to double post. (...) Hey my name no longer has dash but a number 1 in front of it!? Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Oh man ====== I think this might wind up being abused. It's funny, earlier today I was trying to find a picture link for the new "Built to Rule" transformer line on one of the Transformer news groups and I was thinking how glad I was that Lugnet was (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Oh man ====== I think this might wind up being abused. It's funny, earlier today I was trying to find a picture link for the new "Built to Rule" transformer line on one of the Transformer news groups and I was thinking how glad I was that Lugnet was (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
I am very happy to announce three changes today to the LUGNET News web interface: Fixed-width font now used for plain-text messages. Once upon a time, when LUGNET first served up messages via the web, messages were displayed in a fixed-width font. (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: MOCpages is here -- Free web hosting for LEGO creations
|
|
(...) I think "first North American serial rights" is the usual phrase. It still reserves the right to the author to publish it again later, but it should be previously unpublished. This is one reason I won't submit to Bricks Magazine: they don't (...) (22 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: MOCpages is here -- Free web hosting for LEGO creations
|
|
(...) My understanding is that posting something to the web in ANY form constitutes publishing for the sake of this. Print publications will not pay full rates for previously-published material, if they accept it at all. If you're interested in (...) (22 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: taking good photos
|
|
(...) I didn't think that sounded right, but I couldn't figure out why. This sounds an awful lot like how LCD laptop screens work, where they look fine if you set the screen size according to the actual physical pixelation of the screen, but if you (...) (22 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: taking good photos
|
|
(...) I think you are confusing color depth with image area resolution. If the CCD chip has an area of X-by-Y pixels and you are at maximum optical zoom, then any form of digital zoom requires interpolating between adjacent real pixels. The color (...) (22 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: taking good photos
|
|
(...) I tried using thick white paper tape over my flash...and all I got was a blurry large glare spot where previously I'd been getting a crisp large glare spot. The problem is not so much in the quality of light as it is in the direction. If the (...) (22 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
