 | | Re: Story crafting (was Re: Please read this!
|
|
(...) I'm going to fix the dialogue first, then work on the rest of the specifics. (...) Avoid it all costs so the reader can figure it out, then. Noted. (...) Ah, this sounds pretty fun, actually. Why make an enemy obvious when in fact, they would (...) (23 years ago, 24-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Story crafting (was Re: Please read this!
|
|
(...) Great. Now, a note... The samples I picked were just that, samples. I chose a few to illustrate a point, not that if you fix these you're all set. They're characteristic of much of the work that I read. (...) You're often better off not (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Story crafting (was Re: Please read this!
|
|
(...) Boy, you and Sanburn are really zany for posting-group purity! 8^) I moved my part of the thread to ot.geek because I shifted into a particular discussion of authors, rather than the niceties of writing. But if you think it's better steered to (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Story crafting (was Re: Please read this!
|
|
(...) Very well. (...) Okay, I'm working on that and a small index. (...) Hmm...you've got a point there. Perhaps I was trying to convey that he was rather evasive (?) Evasive to reveal his opinion? (...) Hmm...okay, the clouds were almost shaped (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Story crafting (was Re: Please read this!
|
|
(...) True, but we are talking about storycraft, not castle construction. On reflection, publish is the right place I think. (and not o-t.geek either) (...) Yes I have. I have not read all of it but I think much of what others said applies. I found (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
