To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.promoOpen lugnet.promo in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Promotional / 175 (-5)
  Re: Lego vs. Pokemon
 
(...) fast (...) my (...) I've got you both beat, my twin boys are only 8 weeks old so I get no lip about infinite stops at McDonalds. I just hope Pokemon is gone by the time they can care. My fingers are crossed. Cheers, Mark L (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
 
  Re: Lego vs. Pokemon
 
(...) fast (...) my (...) Heh, Heh...yet. If they have friends into Pokemon, it's only a matter of time. :) Julie (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
 
  Re: Lego vs. Pokemon
 
(...) I can be a total parental marshmallow -- our McD is three businesses away from our Burger King (hey, it's a small town; we only get *one* of anything). But my kids don't know about the Pokemon toys. (...) :) Steve (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
 
  Lego vs. Pokemon
 
So how many other parents are going to have to battle the kids over which fast food place to go to? Hubby's gone for the week, I'm thinking "cool, I don't have to cook, the kids will be happy with McD. & we'll get our fill of the sets." But nooooo, (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
 
  Re: McD set numbers
 
(...) I can confirm the numbers for 1 and 6. The number for set 4 is 1995, this is the green slope with printed chicken set. I also agree that the best set is #1, but I also think that #3 and # 5 are especially cool for the hot pink plates and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR