 | | Re: her majesty's new sloop! HMS Tempest has arrived! —Wesley Davis
| | | | (...) Nonono, a sloop has ONE mast (At least since the 17th century; before that, it could be up to 3). Any ship with more than that cannot actually BE a sloop. "Sloop of War" is defined as a ship with cannons on one deck only. Both my own reference (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-04, to lugnet.pirates, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: her majesty's new sloop! HMS Tempest has arrived! —Richie Dulin
| | | | | | (...) As a vessel description, yes, but it should be refered to as "Her Majesty's Sloop Tempest" (Or HM Sloop Tempest). Just like you'd refer to a Royal Navy Brig as "HM Brig ...". But of course, there were no reigning British Queens between 1714 (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.pirates, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: her majesty's new sloop! HMS Tempest has arrived! —Stephen Rowe
| | | | | (...) hi wes, thanks for the help with the rigging difficulty i had, i rerigged it correctly i believe. i put up some new pics. anyway, i have seen the definition of a sloop as a single masted vessel, butthere are also other definitions in all 3 of (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.pirates, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: her majesty's new sloop! HMS Tempest has arrived! —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) Basically, the British are to blame. They used terms in conflicting ways, and then got sloppy (or is that sloopy?) about it. It's a "sloop of war" (class of ship, rather than rigging type), but since that is kinda tedious to say it was simply (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.pirates, FTX)
| | | | | | |
