 | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
Mr L F Braun wrote in message <38496885.5739D2F4@p...su.edu>... (...) not (...) it's (...) You can get a decent tripon for about $20. Unfortuanately it won't totally eliminate camera shake unless your camera has a remote. The tripod will hold the (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
(...) The only thing I don't like about the mavica is if you aren't under florescent or halogen lights (which btw turn blonde hair green in photos) you aren't going to get that great of a shot indoors even with the flash, it's too hot. I have to (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
I use the original Kodak DC-200 (not even a plus). Several tricks I have found: I keep a little piece of wax paper taped over the flash (it helps difuse it a bit) I always take the box shots at highest-res, then set my html to display them at 50% (...) (25 years ago, 7-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
Well, I thought I was all settled on a Mavica, then I stopped in Service Merchandise today. They actually had cameras in stock, and in addition to the Mavica had an Olympus D-450ZOOM 1280x960 w/3x optical zoom. So far, looks like a nice camera. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
(...) Yeah, I'd like to see some of your vaunted creations! :) Always the dilemma...build or sort? Build or sort? Build or sort... Incidentally, I went out and popped $20 on a tripod. It does make a WORLD of difference--I'm still not bowled over by (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
(...) I'm not sure I have anything worthy of being vaunted yet, but if you haven't seen it yet, I do have some creations up now at: (URL) Incidentally, I went out and popped $20 on a tripod. It does make a WORLD of (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
I just bought the Fuji MX-2900. Best features for the price but a bit expensive. think it was $899. Tom "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:FMGL1z.82L@lugnet.com... (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
Frank Filz wrote in message ... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) Here is the camera that I was telling Frank Filz about: (URL) is based on a chipset from SoundVision ((URL) my company, Mentor Graphics ((URL) designed. The camera is targeted at the entry (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
(...) Too bad the production camera doesn't support the sample imaging which Mike originally pointed me to. It showed a nice macro shot of a quarter. This camera will not be able to do that (fixed focus 50cm to infinity). I'm sure the chip is (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up
|
|
Frank Filz wrote in message <3857A4FB.33FA@minds...ng.com>... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) I agree on Frank's point about the focal lenght, it is unfortunate. One other note, I poked around the Mustek web site some more and found that the camera will (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
