 | | Re: Compatible?
|
| (...) I think not... the profile seems too rounded and too tall, and the texture is different. (...) No problem for me ;-) Is it just me, or do others think that Mega-blox is increasingly going down the route of large, specialised pieces that we (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | | | Re: Compatible?
|
| I've seen the same image and wondered. I very much doubt these keels will be compatible with TLC hulls, but depending on how many of those decorations can be stripped off, you might be left with a hull base suitable for a pirate-era ship -- albeit (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Compatible?
|
| (...) The smaller parts (bricks & accessories) are compatible (Purists may not like them on Purity grounds), but the hulls themselves almost certainly will not be. You're right about the rocks-at-sea and historical-compatibility issues, though! (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Compatible?
|
| Those heavily armored knights would sink like rocks out at sea. I'm not sure if the parts are compatible, but I'm sure it's not historically compatible. ;) -Aaron "Richard Noeckel" <shroud_of_kung_fu@hotmail.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Compatible?
|
| ~Dragons Man O’War £49.99 July: (URL) you think these hulls will be compatible with TLC’s hulls. There looks to be some adequate Pirate accessories. Of course, this is only for those who aren’t purist! Thanx, --==Richard==-- Oh and, for the a few of (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Fusilers, Fog, and Mysterious Newcomers – and a Lovely Newfoundland Morning
|
| (...) Much ablidged, though it's only slightly bigger than that of Port Brique... : )Don't worry, we're looking in to recruiting more Riflemen to bolster the force, and I'm toying with a hussar idea (though 'toying' is the only word for it right (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: Misérable
|
| (...) Just so. Sneaking is a business for the night, I find, and thus is best left to port, where you have firm locations on targets. Guns hardly play a part then (unless you face a particularly diligent crew). I wouldn't care to try to run down a (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: Misérable
|
| (...) (Just did a quick scan of the house...) Certainly the Endeavour (albeit a barque) in the mide-late 18th century and the Supply (albeit a brig) in the late 18th/early 19th century had and used spritsails as well as jibs... I've seen a print of (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: Fusilers, Fog, and Mysterious Newcomers – and a Lovely Newfoundland Morning
|
| (...) <snip> That's an impressive force! I do like the torso designs. (...) (URL) ? (...) Well, if one was planning a long voyage, the Misérable would be the vessel for the trip. Actually, with the abundance of white BURPS at the moment, I'm (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: Misérable
|
| (...) Which is a nice idea, but it appears to be most un-French. If the Misérable were a British vessel, where the captain dined on stodgy salt pork and pease the smell of gunpowder could only improve the meal, but on a French Vessel, gunpowder in (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-03, to lugnet.pirates)
|
|
