 | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP! —Timothy Gould
| | | | --SNIP-- (...) As I mentioned the first response to Eric, he has in fact been (URL) told before>. Tim --SNIP-- (18 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP! —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) John's not an admin. A PERMANENT ban would still be shotgun against puppy without prior warning, IMHO. A temporary ban is what apparently has been imposed though. (wasn't very clear at first, still isn't very clear although it is somewhat (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP! —Ross Crawford
| | | | | | (...) Which "certain others"? ROSCO (18 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!) —Ross Crawford
| | | | | | (...) Actually, that raises another question. Should admins disregard advice/warnings given by others (non-admins and admins in non-admin role) in making decisions about timeouts/bans? Seems to me they should count for something, though exactly how (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP! —Allister McLaren
| | | | | (...) Nevertheless, if you read the rest of the thread, Eric did make a (URL) commitment of sorts> not to do it again. So he either willfully disregarded that, or simply forgot, when posting this latest auction. Either one doesn't fill me with any (...) (18 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | | |
