 | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) I wonder what the subscription fee would be if we wanted to pay somebody to run this show FT? What would the "going rate" be if an individual from the USA was employed? I really doubt 1500*$25 ($37500) would be enough? Scott A =+= Have you (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Jason King
|
| | | | | Scott A <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:Gsv03y.HtD@lugnet.com... (...) leadership (...) be a (...) members (...) to (...) Hi Scott, Add me to the list of those wondering the same thing. -- Jason King LugNet #665 (...) (23 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | (...) Hmmm...you've got a point there...I guess It's an issue of both of the topics above, one being 'how many members would remain', and the other being the 'membership price'. I don't think an annual fee would be bad. I could easily afford $25 a (...) (23 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | how much is enough? —Paul Hartzog
|
| | | | (...) well, first of all, some of that $ would go to server costs. but you could pay a number of 'volunteers' the equiv of part-time pay above and beyond their day-jobs. 1) you get better results from the 'employee' (or they get fired) 2) you get (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
