 | | RE: On Hiatus
|
| (...) IMO, the problem is that people seem to think the noise is more important than the content. To me, the content on LUGNET is the MOCs and the related building discussion. Noise is people bickering about why they can't get along...which leads to (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) Jim, I know Tim well enough to say that it is not the name change that brought him to this decision, it was just the last straw of a long complex chain of events. It isn't that he can't handle negativity or criticism. It is that over a long (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| If this is about the name change , it is best that you do take a break. While I feel it was a little out of line for you to ask,(if that indeed is what this is all about) you did it in the nicest possible way. It also got blown out of proportion by (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| I'll admit I'm feeling like some others here do. Tim has always played an important role here on Lugnet but, a partial quote, "Lugnet is a somewhat compartamentalized RTL". There are still times when I find it worth posting something (like the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| (...) I think it is a case of why he is leaving that got it highlighted not so much that he is leaving. Tim was a great advocate for LUGNET and it is very disturbing that he feels he has to walk away for a while. (...) It does to some of us who have (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
|
