 | | Re: Shiri - A one time thing? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Why is this being reopened again? NELUG has chosen to make rules the way they see fit, a democratic process validated those rules and I think it's rather immature of YOU to buck against a club somewhere else and the way they organize. I have a (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Shiri - A one time thing? —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | (...) I think it comes up again because most of us outsiders are just aghast that Shiri isn't already some kind of honored and permanent fixture of the NELUG clubhouse. May I recommend using crazy glue on her sneekers...? =oP -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Shiri - A one time thing? —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) I think it also comes up because AFAIK, they're the only club that has any kind of membership restriction, and it is very baffling to many of us why it would exist. *BUT* again, it's their policy, and their choice. I can respect their opinion (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Shiri - A one time thing? —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Which is *almost* exactly what I was asking for. The only reason that's not *exactly* what I asked for is because I already tried... (URL) the fact is that fewer people read .ma.bos than .org.us.nelug. I got no replies there, and only two by (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | |
