 | | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
In lugnet.people, Eric Joslin writes: <SNIP> (...) <SNIP> WRONG!!! WRONG!! WRONG! In that post I said NELUG was BEING stupid. BIG difference, eric. Don't read meanings into my statements that aren't there!! Paul Sinasohn speaking for myself (25 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
(...) You should- it was sarcasm, meant to point out that your statement was neither thoughtful nor necessary. (...) You are confusing the fact that I haven't seen a reason to change my opinion with the above. (...) Which you are entitled to. But (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
(...) Sure. (...) Actually, no, we aren't. We set an age limit and have decided to keep it. That judges no one in any way. As has been said before, to make an exception for Shiri would mean that we were, essentially, judging anyone that came after (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
Jeremy, For a guy who says he doesn't mean to revive this pointless debate, you're talking a lot about it. Now. saying nothing about any debate, I'll simply state that as a NELUG member, I find your spouting off in our general direction offensive. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
|
(...) learn (...) I doubt it. You've shown no ability to think, consider, or learn from anyone about this issue. Like Jeremy, I have an extremely low opinion of NELUG, and that will change only when I've seen evidence of an ability to PLAY WELL with (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.people)
|
