|
|
 | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Which "certain others"? ROSCO (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) John's not an admin. A PERMANENT ban would still be shotgun against puppy without prior warning, IMHO. A temporary ban is what apparently has been imposed though. (wasn't very clear at first, still isn't very clear although it is somewhat (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| --SNIP-- (...) As I mentioned the first response to Eric, he has in fact been (URL) told before>. Tim --SNIP-- (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | Re: E: A Retrospective
|
| (...) To quote Anders: "Stupid question: In whatever way will that post help?" (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) I see nothing inconsistent here. Eric should get an indefinite timeout until he requests cancels on the posts that clearly are over the line, acknowledges he erred and that the ToS does apply to him, and apologises for causing part of the (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people) !
|
|
