 | | Re: New LUG -- RichLUG —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | (...) ...Well, not sure if wamalug is the best one to give a presentation on how to set up and run a successful lug!!! Seeing as we seem to be having our own internal problems (which I suppose is common in any group). ...The best thing I can say: (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.us.richlug)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New LUG -- RichLUG —Rich Schoonover
|
| | | | | Thanks for all the support. I wasn't sure if I was going to be foolish in doing setting up a LUG or not. I think we will have to let our group here in Richmond develop on its own without intervention. I will always be here to be keep it going. I (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.us.richlug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New LUG -- RichLUG —Timothy D. Freshly
|
| | | | | | Rich Schoonover <rwschoonover@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:G78t8z.57x@lugnet.com... (...) here (...) share (...) to (...) I agree. Informal is the best way to start out. Let the group kind of flow where it wants to go. (...) want (...) (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.us.richlug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New LUG -- RichLUG —Timothy D. Freshly
|
| | | | Stephen F Roberts <wubwub@wildlink.com> wrote in message news:6jb76tsto5ff2eo...4ax.com... (...) to (...) everyone (...) list (...) I named WAMALUG mainly because of proximity to Richmond. I agree that the group will have to develop on its own. But (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.us.richlug)
|
| | | | |
