Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 21:20:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1890 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Richard W. Schamus writes:
> No Eric, I don't think that I should go back and root out everything you said
> and compile it here for you (out of context mind you, for which you would
> assuridly find fault with).
So, in other words, you can't support it. That's fine. I just want you to be
aware of it.
> Perhaps you don't uncomfortable. Perhaps you just don't feel anything. I have
> no idea at all. All I do have is your continual post requests to not talk
> about it OPENLY.
Can you show me a quote where I told anyone not to talk about it? I don't
think so, again.
I have never said that people shouldn't talk about it. I am here, talking
about it. I will stress again, however, that the opinions of non-NELUG members
on the subject mean little to me, and I have not attempted to solicit them, nor
do I feel that I have to go over the specifics of mine with them.
> Let's get back to the point.
> There is a question. Would you please answer it? (And please don't insult my
> or other intelligence with some witty quip about "what is the question again?"
> Why the age limit for NELUG, in your humble opinion, when other LUGs can and
> do get around it).
Because we want it that way. That's pretty much the whole point, here. We had
a discussion and came to a consensus about it. I am more than willing to have
another discussion about it. The main reason I've been saying that I'm willing
to do so is that I don't want to give anyone- you, the other members of NELUG,
or most of all Shiri- the idea that I don't want to talk about it.
I just don't see the need to talk about it with *you*, or any other non-NELUG
member. I'm sorry if that leaves you feeling left out, but it's our club, and
we'll run it as we see fit. We are perfectly aware that other clubs can and do
have members under 18. We would rather remain a group of adults, however.
Thanks.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) <snip> I will stress again, however, that the opinions of non-NELUG members (...) nor (...) Ok. Let's go back to the original poster. SHE, (not you, or anyone else) solicited the opinions of others. I by no means meant to actually solicit your (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) No Eric, I don't think that I should go back and root out everything you said and compile it here for you (out of context mind you, for which you would assuridly find fault with). Perhaps you don't uncomfortable. Perhaps you just don't feel (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
