Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 21:24:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4833 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Richard W. Schamus writes:
> In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Matthew Miller writes:
> > Richard Schamus <legoman34@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > > That you feel that you are injured and your rights have been trounced by
> > > OPEN
> > > DISCUSSION only lowers my own personal opinion of NELUG in general, and you
> >
> > Open discussion is one thing, and I don't think that would have bothered
> > Eric. It's the general aggressive tone people have taken with us that he
> > takes issue with.
> I agreee, the aggressive name-calling is always unjust and without merit.
>
> What I find distasteful is, every close of a post from Eric is, (please don't
> knitpick my quote, as it is an amalgam of many of his posts) "We should
> discuss this in a NELUG meeting."
Because I think it's an important issue, and NELUG should hash it out in
person, with the interested parties (ie, people who are actually in the club
and attend meetings) having a say.
> Now, don't get me wrong, I'll not suppose that I can or should dictate policy
> to anyone. I just feel that I shouldn't be dictated to either. I'll OPENLY
> DISCUSS anything I think is appropriate in this forum for as long as I'm
> interested or able. Shiri asked for OPEN DISCUSSSION, and I will be faithful
> to that request.
Great. You can have all the open discussion you want. But in the end, the
decision about what to do will reside with NELUG members, and I think this is
an important enough issue to talk about face-to-face.
> I sorry that Eric has been bombarded with unpleasentries, but
> it hasn't come from me, nor do I support it in any way shape or form. I just
> don't think that he will be able to cite these things in an attempt to get the
> discussion into someplace more private.
Huh? Cite what things? What are you talking about?
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) Fairly closely. I agreee, the aggressive name-calling is always unjust and without merit. What I find distasteful is, every close of a post from Eric is, (please don't knitpick my quote, as it is an amalgam of many of his posts) "We should (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
