To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.nelugOpen lugnet.org.us.nelug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / NELUG / 1699 (-10)
  Re: Meeting
 
(...) Do we have a count of how may will be there for the meeting Monday? Do we have enough to require calling and getting the room first? I only know of about 7 that I expect will be there. We do have several things to do and talk about so I am (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
 
  Re: NELUG Paraphenalia Ready for Mondays meeting.
 
OK I got the shirts. For those that can't wait here are pictures of each. Sorry the Polo pic is a little blurry but they all look great. Henley: (URL) those that didn't get in on this order but think they might like one now let me know because we (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
 
  Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
 
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Joe Comeau writes: <snip> (...) I think this is close to what I was thinking. Obviously team A knows something about team B but not everything and while they know some of their weapons team B obviously isn't going to leave (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
 
  Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
 
"Eric Kingsley" <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote in message news:GFCqq1.KFs@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) the (...) pages (...) them? (...) have (...) rescue (...) attack (...) forest". (...) see, or (...) the (...) would (...) of (...) get (...) in (...) (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
 
  Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
 
(...) OK how about this... Lets say that Team A has captured our ravishingly beautiful princes and have brought them to their stonghold. Their goal is to hold her, Team B must rescue her. Now in reality Team B would be able to see the fortress and (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
 
  Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
 
(...) Not really. Does anyone else from Team B think it's terribly wrong of us to reveal what we've got? I don't particularly care. It makes for good planning, I suppose. But then again, I suppose I wasn't really planning to bring anything to the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
 
  Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
 
(...) We on Team A have a pretty solid idea of troop / fortification type. I think what we've built and the style of it are relevant to this discussion. If everyone will see our stuff on Monday anyway, and we're building a storyline now, is there (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
 
  Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
 
(...) Well-- really what it means is like Eric J. said (and I recall saying in the past), wherein if one team is defending, the attacking team gets a bit of a bonus becuase defending a good position/item has slight advantages. My thought on (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
 
  Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
 
Hi, Richard Again. You guys sound so very technical about everything! Therefore, the best technical wargame out there is WARHAMMER(R) Check out their section on Senerion, and capturing an objective. Every thing in their games is completely balanced (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
 
  Re: NLDA [aka Medieval] Brikwars*
 
(...) Possibly. Part of the problem is that we've never really planned ahead in quite this much detail (picking sides, etc). A good rule of thumb for wargames like this is that an army defending a well-fortified position should get somewhere between (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR