 | | Re: GATS Train SHow (was Get together Saturday) —Cary Clark
|
| | | I like layout 2 and 5 the best, but any of them besides 1 is fine. With 16 large and 4 small tables, any of the layouts shown can be made. Since at least 12 large are required for any of the layouts, it would seem pretty reasonable to sign up to (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.us.nclug)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: GATS Train SHow (was Get together Saturday) —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | "Cary Clark" <cary@corp.nospamwebtv.net> wrote in message news:G7KnI7.7nC@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) The building specs are here: (URL) don't recall the thickness but I would guess a total of 2 1/2 inches when the legs are removed. I like Cary's (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.us.nclug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: GATS Train SHow (was Get together Saturday) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I won't want very many tables for personal use yet, it will also depend on what kind of legs we use. If we use the pre-fab folding legs, I'll want fewer tables than if we use the PNLTC wooden legs (the issue is how useable is the space under (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.us.nclug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: GATS Train SHow (was Get together Saturday) —Sheree Rosenkrantz
|
| | | | (...) I prefer 2 most, next would come 3 or 5 minus the two small tables projecting inwards. I prefer not to have any inward projections to bump into. I had a hard time picturing the table set up until it penetrated that the table dimensions were (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.us.nclug)
|
| | | | |
