 | | (canceled) —Amy Hughes
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: GATS layout suggestions —Chris Leach
|
| | | | (...) Amy I moved the road over.I had a enough room between big red and your white building to slide things to the left. (...) Ok i moved the monorail.Keep in mind the track(mono) sits on 16 bricks then the track itself(to keep clear for the RR (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: GATS layout suggestions —Peter Guenther
|
| | | | (...) 16 bricks? Shoot, this could be a little tight for my Amtrak Superliner... Not to mention the dinosaur transport car. I think both of those end up being 14 high (counting wheels) so we should be OK, if people even want to run these... Peter (23 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: GATS layout suggestions —Chris Leach
|
| | | | (...) Wow 14 high that's tall! With them sitting on the track that will be a tight fit!I thought by going with 16 it wouldn't even come close to being a problem. (23 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: GATS layout suggestions —Peter Guenther
|
| | | | (...) Now that I think about it, I think it was 14 high with wheels AND track. The Superliner is a double-decker train, remember--even though I used the lowboy plates, I think it's 11 bricks and a plate on top of the low part of the plate. Peter (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: GATS layout suggestions —Chris Leach
|
| | | | (...) WHEW! (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| | | | |
