Subject:
|
Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.michlug
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Jul 2001 02:29:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
744 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Peter Guenther writes:
> In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Chris Leach writes:
> > In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Peter Guenther writes:
> > > > Ok i moved the monorail.Keep in mind the track(mono) sits on 16 bricks then
> > > > the track itself(to keep clear for the RR track).
> > >
> > > 16 bricks? Shoot, this could be a little tight for my Amtrak Superliner...
> > > Not to mention the dinosaur transport car. I think both of those end up
> > > being 14 high (counting wheels) so we should be OK, if people even want to
> > > run these...
> >
> > Wow 14 high that's tall! With them sitting on the track that will be a tight
> > fit!I thought by going with 16 it wouldn't even come close to being a problem.
>
> Now that I think about it, I think it was 14 high with wheels AND track.
> The Superliner is a double-decker train, remember--even though I used the
> lowboy plates, I think it's 11 bricks and a plate on top of the low part of
> the plate.
WHEW!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
| (...) Now that I think about it, I think it was 14 high with wheels AND track. The Superliner is a double-decker train, remember--even though I used the lowboy plates, I think it's 11 bricks and a plate on top of the low part of the plate. Peter (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
