 | | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
|
(...) Wow 14 high that's tall! With them sitting on the track that will be a tight fit!I thought by going with 16 it wouldn't even come close to being a problem. (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | More medieval village
|
|
Just to get people's interest up for the benefit event, and to show some things I've been talking about, I've posted a few pics of my newest medieval stuff to Brickshelf. Quality is terrible because I used the only camera available to me, the Lego (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
|
(...) 16 bricks? Shoot, this could be a little tight for my Amtrak Superliner... Not to mention the dinosaur transport car. I think both of those end up being 14 high (counting wheels) so we should be OK, if people even want to run these... Peter (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) I don't think we'd have a real problem with a policy like this. If you look at out January display, we filled--what was it, 18x24?--a layout and had very few stock buildings. Lots of stock cars and train parts, but really not that many stock (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
|
(...) Amy I moved the road over.I had a enough room between big red and your white building to slide things to the left. (...) Ok i moved the monorail.Keep in mind the track(mono) sits on 16 bricks then the track itself(to keep clear for the RR (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
