Subject:
|
Re: Lots of Bits
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.lucny
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jun 2002 01:12:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
882 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.lucny, Wayne Sardullo writes:
> Ok people I'm slowly adding info this week. Just for an overview on what to
> expect.
>
> #1 Recycling and development of LUCNY webpage. This will take some a little
> time but hopefully will have the general stuff opened to you all. Just an FYI
> until we figure out what to do for the future is since we lost www.lucny.org
> I'm going to attach LUCNY to my account within College. I will not be able to
> alias a domain name to it so for the time being it will be something like
>
> http://www.oswego.edu/~sardullo/lucny/lucny.html
>
> There isnt anything there but should be soon. I will now open up suggestions
> for what you think is important to the Website.
>
> Things I will use. A brief overview and story about us. a generic list of its
> members. The rules/Bylaws(Need to find them). Or at least rewrite them.
> including info on how to become a member.
>
> Specialist Members. (this will be a page dedicated for people who have
> expertize in a particular area of Lego)
IMHO, this is priority II, just after the layout, but before a show. We
need a professional looking site (like your homepage, Wayne), to put on
flyers and give to both show coordinators and the public to learn more about us.
> -----------------------
>
> Lucny Membership resposibilities
"You cannot escape the responsibility of tomorrow by evading it today."
-Abraham Lincoln
> Since we are slowly coming up on more professional things as I said before I
> would like to offically open up the board for the following areas. For positions
>
> These positions each have a unique angle to cover what so far we have seen in
> the group.
>
> Obviously, we need someone as the leader. At least in a sense to keep LUCNY
> members up to speed as well as informed on upcoming meetings or future events.
> I have to apologize to Nate, John R, and Kevin. Although we had a GREAT time at
> our last meeting I just didn't even bother with an agenda. For future, THIS
> WILL BE IMPORTANT!!
I hate to contradict you here, but, just as an agenda is good, we also need
to schedual in those minutes we spent inspecting and trading and such.
>
> I would like to vote on this and make it more offical. ( Anyone want the
> position) If not, feel free to vote me in. :)
<Boris Voice>Zoundz Good, fearlezz leader</Boris Voice>
> Levels of Membership.
>
> I was looking at some of the other groups and noticed that not all members
> contribute in the same way. In a sense I feel that this might actually help us
> out. I know we all can't get together and some have other ideas. I would like
> to include as many people in our group as possible. Not everyone has to
> contribute 1 million bricks, but maybe offer other things like support or other
> resourses to the cause.
>
> Here's some of the ideas.
>
> (Within typical membership)
> Builders (Layout and Build Designs)
> Specialists (within their field)
I'd like to propose that The preceding two positions be combined into
"Builder with a specialty in...", that way one of us isn't always tied into
MOCing (is that a viable verb?) in a certain genre. We can always MOC in
our minor if need be.
The list in my head is as follows (Anyone omitted means I have no clue what
your specialty is):
-Wayne S.: Builder with a specialty in Trains, minors in Town and supporting
structures.
-Kevin S.:Builder with a specialty in Town (both vehicles and taller
buildings), minors in Train (though is becoming incresingly involved).
-Nate: Builder with a specialty in Western and Town, minors in ?????.
-John B.:Builder with a specialty in Mindstorms (sensors and autonomy),
minors in Train and System Applied Mindstorms.
-The Drumms:Builders with a specialty in Bionicle, minors in Town details
and lettering?.
-Ed M.:Builder with a specialty in Trains and Town, minors in automated
supporting structures.
-John R.:Builder with a specialty in Town (both vehicles and Short
buildings), minors in Train, Western and Space.
> Contributors (Money, Blocks, Support, Meeting Locations...)
> Other (not sure what else)
>
>
> Obviously we are all members but how can we each focus are talents further to
> get us to where we wanna go...? Thats the question I ask
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The Folding table issue. I will answer this tomorrow. The one I thought we
> agreed on was from Staples. However, when I looked via web thats not what we
> found at John R. Place. John what site what that from???
http://www.officedepot.com/shop/catalog/sku.asp?ID=369009&LEVEL=SK
But it seems the price has gone up $12.00 !!!
> (More to come.)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No once else made any comments about the layout opinions I posted uses 4 30x60
> tables. PLEASE speak up and voice your opinion on this so we can start placing
> restate.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=17789
>
> From the picts the only one that fails for the trains and takes up to much
> space is "tables-3" due to the huge arc that is applied after bridge.
Actually, Nicole did comment that she liked the last option, the 'S' the best
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- • <snip>
> Looking into the next meeting.... (Test layout)
>
> I would like to start considering a meeting time for mockup of first layout.
> However, before we can do that we need to be sure we have:
>
> Tables
> Table layout design
I don't see this as important. I think that if we have the tables, we can
play around and see what fits. If we plan ahead too much, I think that (no
offense meant) we will have 1 person's design. It's so hard to talk designs
for track w/o interaction.
> Buildings
> Tracks
> Trains
> (Lots of Evaluation)
>
> June is a tough month for me because most of the weekends I have something on a
> Sat or Sun. I will work with the majority though when would be the best time to
> meet.
June's not good for me as well, seeing that Regents and a trip to Gettysburg
will be taking up the bulk of my time. Mid July looks good here, I'll work
around everyone else as well, the Garage is CLEAN!!! now. :)
> ---------
>
> End of Transmission
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Lots of Bits
|
| (...) <MAJOR SNIPPAGE> YES YES and YES... I agree. I had so much on my mind that after reading everything I wrote, I wondered where my mind was. The only thing that I really feel like working on is the Webpage stuff. Thats a good thing. Keeping that (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-02, to lugnet.org.us.lucny)
| | | Re: Lots of Bits
|
| "John Rudy" <TJJohn12@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message news:Gx5q11.26v@lugnet.com... <snippered!> (...) about us. I agree. (...) <snippered!> (...) members (...) help us (...) like (...) other (...) into (...) what (...) supporting (...) Ok looks (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-02, to lugnet.org.us.lucny)
| | | Re: Lots of Bits
|
| You know, I was drafting a response while I was on the road this week, and John posted a reply that has many of my response elements, so I'll piggyback where applicable below: (...) I think we should take advantage of Wayne's efforts to continue (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-02, to lugnet.org.us.lucny)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Lots of Bits
|
| Ok people I'm slowly adding info this week. Just for an overview on what to expect. #1 Recycling and development of LUCNY webpage. This will take some a little time but hopefully will have the general stuff opened to you all. Just an FYI until we (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jun-02, to lugnet.org.us.lucny)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
