Subject:
|
Re: Tic-Tac-Toe-bot
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:23:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1393 times
|
| |
|
|
3T - good name...
32x32 plate for the game sounds exceptional...you could break it into 10x10
squares with a 1 stud width divider...no edge markers (would add a little to the
challenge maybe)
Size of the cube: Using odd size cubes (3x3, 5x5, 7x7) is more compatible with
studless building techniques based on the standard length straight lift arms.
So, that kind of plays into our latest craze :)
And, as Steve (or was that Tim Taylor?) pointed out - bigger is better...or at
least more fun to watch. So I vote for 7x7 :)
B
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Tic-Tac-Toe-bot
|
| (...) This would be a timed game. The winner would be the robot with the lowest average time-per-move. Actually, I was just thinking about it. Even that may not be a good comparison. I think robots should play each other twice, with each going first (...) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
