Subject:
|
Re: Tic-Tac-Toe-bot
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:16:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
662 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> On Thu, September 22, 2005 10:52 am, Brian Davis wrote:
> >
> > 3-in-a-row on a 4x4 board should take Kerby about 5 seconds
> > Has anyone ever heard of a game called "Pente"?
>
> There are lots of other games we could play, with much more complex strategies. I
> think 3T... (the name for this game?!) ...is a game that everyone can understand
> the logic, and it should be playable with standard firmware.
What about Othello? That requires the robot to be able to place AND reverse the
pieces. Not sure if 8x8 would produce very interesting matches, maybe a smaller
board? Even 4x4 may produce interesting strategies...
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Tic-Tac-Toe-bot
|
| (...) This would be a timed game. The winner would be the robot with the lowest average time-per-move. Actually, I was just thinking about it. Even that may not be a good comparison. I think robots should play each other twice, with each going first (...) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
