Subject:
|
Re: 3T board & rules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:31:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1870 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, December 27, 2005 1:53 pm, Brian Davis wrote:
> > I assume that the game only ends when (a) the winning cube is in the
> > proper cell, or (b) the ninth and final cube is in it's proper cell.
> > So assume both robots are started at the same moment (by pressing
> > the "run" button), can we assume the game is over (from the standpoint
> > of measuring elapsed time) when that final cube is placed, or does the
> > final moving robot have to press the handover button to end its run?
>
> Huh. After playing for a while, I'm noticing a lot of interesting odd ways of
> minimizing time. My 'bot's not fast enough I fear, but this ends up being and
> interesting problem.
Not many comments. Sorry. The game should end after the last robot gives a signal
(handoff). That way it can be timed by an external source (not just someone
watching the game)
> > Finally, with regards to clearing the board... I'm assuming this is
> > a manually-triggered behavior? Otherwise we need another handoff
> > procedure.
We haven't much discussed clearing the board.
We are planning on gathering at my place on Monday (Jan 2) to test out the games.
It will be rough.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 3T board & rules
|
| (...) Huh. After playing for a while, I'm noticing a lot of interesting odd ways of minimizing time. My 'bot's not fast enough I fear, but this ends up being and interesting problem. (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
